Inside-out assembly of viral antigens for the enhanced vaccination.

Current attempts in vaccine delivery systems concentrate on replicating the natural dissemination of live pathogens, but neglect that pathogens evolve to evade the immune system rather than to provoke it. In the case of enveloped RNA viruses, it is the natural dissemination of nucleocapsid protein (NP, core antigen) and surface antigen that delays NP exposure to immune surveillance. Here, we report a multi-layered aluminum hydroxide-stabilized emulsion (MASE) to dictate the delivery sequence of the antigens. In this manner, the receptor-binding domain (RBD, surface antigen) of the spike protein was trapped inside the nanocavity, while NP was absorbed on the outside of the droplets, enabling the burst release of NP before RBD. Compared with the natural packaging strategy, the inside-out strategy induced potent type I interferon-mediated innate immune responses and triggered an immune-potentiated environment in advance, which subsequently boosted CD40+ DC activations and the engagement of the lymph nodes. In both H1N1 influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, rMASE significantly increased antigen-specific antibody secretion, memory T cell engagement, and Th1-biased immune response, which diminished viral loads after lethal challenge. By simply reversing the delivery sequence of the surface antigen and core antigen, the inside-out strategy may offer major implications for enhanced vaccinations against the enveloped RNA virus.

Developmental and reproductive toxicity of a recombinant protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001) in rats.

ZF2001, a protein subunit vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), contains recombinant tandem repeat of dimeric receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with an aluminium-based adjuvant. During the development of this vaccine, two nonclinical studies were conducted to evaluate female fertility, embryo-fetal development, and postnatal developmental toxicity in Sprague‒Dawley rats according to the ICH S5 (R3) guideline. In Study 1 (embryo-fetal developmental toxicity, EFD), 144 virgin female rats were randomly assigned into four groups and received three doses of vaccine (25 µg or 50 µg RBD protein/dose, containing the aluminium-based adjuvant), the aluminium-based adjuvant or a sodium chloride injection administered intramuscularly on days 21 and 7 prior to mating and on gestation day (GD) 6. In Study 2 (pre- and postnatal developmental toxicity, PPND), ZF2001 at a dose of 25 µg RBD protein/dose or sodium chloride injection was administered intramuscularly to female rats (n = 28 per group) 7 days prior to mating and on GD 6, GD 20 and postnatal day (PND) 10. There were no obvious adverse effects in dams, except for local injection site reactions related to the aluminium-based adjuvant (yellow nodular deposits in the interstitial muscle fibres). There were also no effects of ZF2001 on the mating performance, fertility or reproductive performance of parental females, embryo-fetal development, postnatal survival, growth, physical development, reflex ontogeny, behavioural and neurofunctional development, or reproductive performance of the offspring. The strong immune responses associated with binding and neutralising antibodies were both confirmed in dams and fetuses or offspring in these two studies. These results would support clinical trials or the use of ZF2001 in maternal immunisation campaigns, including those involving women with childbearing potential, regardless of pregnancy status.

Rapid evaluation of heterologous chimeric RBD-dimer mRNA vaccine for currently-epidemic Omicron sub-variants as booster shot after inactivated vaccine

Graphical With continuous mutations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the severe immune escape of Omicron sub-variants urges the development of next-generation broad-spectrum vaccines, especially as booster jabs after high-level vaccination coverage of inactivated vaccines in China and many other countries. Previously, we developed a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) protein subunit vaccine ZF2001® based on the tandem homo-prototype receptor-binding domain (RBD)-dimer of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We upgraded the antigen into a hetero-chimeric prototype (PT)-Beta or Delta-BA.1 RBD-dimer to broaden the cross-protection efficacy and prove its efficiency with protein subunit and mRNA vaccine platforms. Herein, we further explored the hetero-chimeric RBD-dimer mRNA vaccines and evaluated their broad-spectrum activities as booster jabs following two doses of inactivated vaccine in mice. Our data demonstrated that the chimeric vaccines significantly boosted neutralizing antibody levels and specific T-cell responses against the variants, and PT-Beta was superior to Delta-BA.1 RBD as a booster in mice, shedding light on the antigen design for the next-generation COVID-19 vaccines.

Effect of adjuvanting RBD-dimer-based subunit COVID-19 vaccines with Sepivac SWE™.

Protein subunit vaccines have been widely used to combat infectious diseases, including the current COVID-19 pandemic. Adjuvants play the key role in shaping the quality and magnitude of the immune response to protein and inactivated vaccines. We previously developed a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine, termed ZF2001, based on an aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted tandem-repeat dimeric receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike (S) protein. Here, we described the use of a squalene-based oil-in-water adjuvant, Sepivac SWE™ (abbreviated to SWE), to further improve the immunogenicity of this RBD-dimer-based subunit vaccines. Compared with ZF2001, SWE adjuvant enhanced the antibody and CD4+ T-cell responses in mice with at least 10 fold of dose sparing compared with ZF2001 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. SWE-adjuvanted vaccine protected mice against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. To ensure adequate protection against the currently circulating Omicron variant, we evaluated this adjuvant in combination with Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer. SWE significantly increased antibody responses compared with aluminium hydroxide adjuvant and afforded greater neutralization breadth. These data highlight the advantage of emulsion-based adjuvants to elevate the protective immune response of protein subunit COVID-19 vaccines.

A booster of Delta-Omicron RBD-dimer protein subunit vaccine augments sera neutralization of Omicron sub-variants BA.1/BA.2/BA.2.12.1/BA.4/BA.5.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants of concern (VOCs) showed severe resistance to the early-approved COVID-19 vaccines-induced immune responses. The breakthrough infections by the Omicron VOCs are currently the major challenge for pandemic control. Therefore, booster vaccination is crucial to enhance immune responses and protective efficacy. Previously, we developed a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine ZF2001, based on the immunogen of receptor-binding domain (RBD) homodimer, which was approved in China and other countries. To adapt SARS-CoV-2 variants, we further developed chimeric Delta-Omicron BA.1 RBD-dimer immunogen which induced broad immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants. In this study, we tested the boosting effect of this chimeric RBD-dimer vaccine in mice after priming with two doses of inactivated vaccines, compared with a booster of inactivated vaccine or ZF2001. The results demonstrated that boosting with bivalent Delta-Omicron BA.1 vaccine greatly promoted the neutralizing activity of the sera to all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, the Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer vaccine is a feasible booster for those with prior vaccination of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines.

Rapid evaluation of heterologous chimeric RBD-dimer mRNA vaccine for currently-epidemic Omicron sub-variants as booster shot after inactivated vaccine.

With continuous mutations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the severe immune escape of Omicron sub-variants urges the development of next-generation broad-spectrum vaccines, especially as booster jabs after high-level vaccination coverage of inactivated vaccines in China and many other countries. Previously, we developed a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) protein subunit vaccine ZF2001® based on the tandem homo-prototype receptor-binding domain (RBD)-dimer of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We upgraded the antigen into a hetero-chimeric prototype (PT)-Beta or Delta-BA.1 RBD-dimer to broaden the cross-protection efficacy and prove its efficiency with protein subunit and mRNA vaccine platforms. Herein, we further explored the hetero-chimeric RBD-dimer mRNA vaccines and evaluated their broad-spectrum activities as booster jabs following two doses of inactivated vaccine (IV) in mice. Our data demonstrated that the chimeric vaccines significantly boosted neutralizing antibody levels and specific T-cell responses against the variants, and PT-Beta was superior to Delta-BA.1 RBD as a booster in mice, shedding light on the antigen design for the next-generation COVID-19 vaccines.

Safety and immunogenicity of a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001) in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and an open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: ZF2001 is a recombinant protein subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that has been approved for use in China, Colombia, Indonesia, and Uzbekistan in adults aged 18 years or older, but not yet in children and adolescents younger than 18 years. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ZF2001 in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China. METHODS: The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and the open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial were done at the Xiangtan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Hunan Province, China). Healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years, without a history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, without a history of COVID-19, without COVID-19 at the time of the study, and without contact with patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were included in the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. In the phase 1 trial, participants were divided into three groups according to age (3-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-17 years). Each group was randomly assigned (4:1), using block randomisation with five blocks, each with a block size of five, to receive three 25 µg doses of the vaccine, ZF2001, or placebo intramuscularly in the arm 30 days apart. The participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. In the phase 2 trial, participants received three 25 µg doses of ZF2001 30 days apart and remained stratified by age group. For phase 1, the primary endpoint was safety and the secondary endpoint was immunogenicity (humoral immune response on day 30 after the third vaccine dose: geometric mean titre [GMT] of prototype SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies and seroconversion rate, and geometric mean concentration [GMC] of prototype SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain [RBD]-binding IgG antibodies and seroconversion rate). For phase 2, the primary endpoint was the GMT of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies with seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, and the secondary endpoints included the GMT of RBD-binding antibodies and seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, the GMT of neutralising antibodies against the omicron BA.2 subvariant and seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, and safety. Safety was analysed in participants who received at least one dose of the vaccine or placebo. Immunogenicity was analysed in the full-analysis set (ie, participants who received at least one dose and had antibody results) by intention to treat and in the per-protocol set (ie, participants who completed the whole vaccination course and had antibody results). Non-inferiority in the phase 2 trial (neutralising antibody titre of participants from this trial aged 3-17 years vs that of participants aged 18-59 years from a separate phase 3 trial) for clinical outcome assessment was based on the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and was considered met if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the GMR was 0·67 or greater. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04961359 (phase 1) and NCT05109598 (phase 2). FINDINGS: Between July 10 and Sept 4, 2021, 75 children and adolescents were randomly assigned to receive ZF2001 (n=60) or placebo (n=15) in the phase 1 trial and were included in safety and immunogenicity analyses. Between Nov 5, 2021, and Feb 14, 2022, 400 participants (130 aged 3-7 years, 210 aged 6-11 years, and 60 aged 12-17 years) were included in the phase 2 trial and were included in the safety analysis; six participants were excluded from the immunogenicity analyses. 25 (42%) of 60 participants in the ZF2001 group and seven (47%) of 15 participants in the placebo group in phase 1, and 179 (45%) of 400 participants in phase 2, had adverse events within 30 days after the third vaccination, without a significant difference between groups in phase 1. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 (73 [97%] of 75 in the phase 1 trial, and 391 [98%] of 400 in the phase 2 trial). One participant in the phase 1 trial and three in the phase 2 trial who received ZF2001 had serious adverse events. One serious adverse event (acute allergic dermatitis) in the phase 2 trial was possibly related to the vaccine. In the phase 1 trial, on day 30 after the third dose, in the ZF2001 group, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was observed in 56 (93%; 95% CI 84-98) of 60 participants, with a GMT of 176·5 (95% CI 118·6-262·8), and seroconversion of RBD-binding antibodies was observed in all 60 (100%; 95% CI 94-100) participants, with a GMC of 47·7 IU/mL (95% CI 40·1-56·6). In the phase 2 trial, on day 14 after the third dose, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was seen in 392 (99%; 95% CI 98-100) participants, with a GMT of 245·4 (95% CI 220·0-273·7), and seroconversion of RBD-binding antibodies was observed in all 394 (100%; 99-100) participants, with a GMT of 8021 (7366-8734). On day 14 after the third dose, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against the omicron subvariant BA.2 was observed in 375 (95%; 95% CI 93-97) of 394 participants, with a GMT of 42·9 (95% CI 37·9-48·5). For the non-inferiority comparison of participants aged 3-17 years with those aged 18-59 years for SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies, the adjusted GMR was 8·6 (95% CI 7·0-10·4), with the lower bound of the GMR greater than 0·67. INTERPRETATION: ZF2001 is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years. Vaccine-elicited sera can neutralise the omicron BA.2 subvariant, but with reduced activity. The results support further studies of ZF2001 in children and adolescents. FUNDING: Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical and the Excellent Young Scientist Program from National Natural Science Foundation of China. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Preclinical Toxicity and Immunogenicity of a COVID-19 Vaccine (ZF2001) in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

Although the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak occurred in late 2019, it is still endemic worldwide, and has become a global public health problem. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered to be the most effective intervention to prevent the spread of COVID-19. ZF2001 is a recombinant protein vaccine based on SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) subunit which contains aluminum adjuvant. In order to advance our research on ZF2001 into clinical trial, we investigated the general toxicity and immunogenicity of ZF2001 in cynomolgus monkeys and assessed the possible target organs for vaccine-induced toxicity. In the present research, we observed no significant systemic toxicities and abnormal cardiovascular and respiratory events following four times injections of intramuscular ZF2001 in cynomolgus monkeys. Histological examination revealed recoverable inflammatory changes in quadricep muscle and adjacent lymph node at the vaccine injection site. As expected, the vaccine can produce a strongly specific binding antibody and neutralizing antibodies in cynomolgus monkeys after inoculation. Taken together, our regulatory toxicology research proves the safety and immunogenicity of the ZF2001 vaccine, supporting its entry into large scale clinical trials.

Immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: an update of data published by 31 December 2021.

The unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a disaster for public health in the last 2 years, without any sign of an ending. Various vaccines were developed rapidly as soon as the outbreak occurred. Clinical trials demonstrated the reactogenicity, immunogenicity and protection efficacy in humans, and some of the vaccines have been approved for clinical use. However, waves of infections such as the recently circulating Omicron variant still occur. Newly emerging variants, especially the variants of concern, and waning humoral responses pose serious challenges to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previously, we summarized the humoral and cellular immunity, safety profiles and protection efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines with clinical data published by 21 May 2021. In this review, we summarize and update the published clinical data of COVID-19 vaccines and candidates up to December 31, 2021.

Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an adenovirus type-5-vectored and protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia/ZF2001): A randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Heterologous boost vaccination has been proposed as an option to elicit stronger and broader, or longer-lasting immunity. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of heterologous immunization with a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (Convidecia, hereafter referred to as CV) and a protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001, hereafter referred to as ZF). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, in which healthy adults aged 18 years or older, who have received 1 dose of Convidecia, with no history of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, were recruited in Jiangsu, China. Sixty participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 1 dose of ZF2001 or placebo control (trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV)) administered at 28 days after priming, and received the third injection with ZF2001 at 5 months, referred to as CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D28-M5) and CV/ZF (D0-M5) regimen, respectively. Sixty participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 1 dose of ZF2001 or TIV administered at 56 days after priming, and received the third injection with ZF2001 at 6 months, referred to as CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D56-M6) and CV/ZF (D0-M6) regimen, respectively. Participants and investigators were masked to the vaccine received but not to the boosting interval. Primary endpoints were the geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and 7-day solicited adverse reactions. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Between April 7, 2021 and May 6, 2021, 120 eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive ZF2001/ZF2001 (n = 40) or TIV/ZF2001 (n = 20) 28 days and 5 months post priming, and receive ZF2001/ZF2001 (n = 40) or TIV/ZF2001 (n = 20) 56 days and 6 months post priming. Of them, 7 participants did not receive the third injection with ZF2001. A total of 26 participants (21.7%) reported solicited adverse reactions within 7 days post boost vaccinations, and all the reported adverse reactions were mild, with 13 (32.5%) in CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D28-M5) regimen, 7 (35.0%) in CV/ZF (D0- M5) regimen, 4 (10.0%) in CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D56-M6) regimen, and 2 (10.0%) in CV/ZF (D0-M6) regimen, respectively. At 14 days post first boost, GMTs of neutralizing antibodies in recipients receiving ZF2001 at 28 days and 56 days post priming were 18.7 (95% CI 13.7 to 25.5) and 25.9 (17.0 to 39.3), respectively, with geometric mean ratios of 2.0 (1.2 to 3.5) and 3.4 (1.8 to 6.4) compared to TIV. GMTs at 14 days after second boost of neutralizing antibodies increased to 107.2 (73.7 to 155.8) in CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D28-M5) regimen and 141.2 (83.4 to 238.8) in CV/ZF/ZF (D0-D56-M6) regimen. Two-dose schedules of CV/ZF (D0-M5) and CV/ZF (D0-M6) induced antibody levels comparable with that elicited by 3-dose schedules, with GMTs of 90.5 (45.6, 179.8) and 94.1 (44.0, 200.9), respectively. Study limitations include the absence of vaccine effectiveness in a real-world setting and current lack of immune persistence data. CONCLUSIONS: Heterologous boosting with ZF2001 following primary vaccination with Convidecia is more immunogenic than a single dose of Convidecia and is not associated with safety concerns. These results support flexibility in cooperating viral vectored and recombinant protein vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study on Heterologous Prime-boost of Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine (Ad5 Vector) and RBD-based Protein Subunit Vaccine; ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04833101.

Efficacy and Safety of the RBD-Dimer-Based Covid-19 Vaccine ZF2001 in Adults.

BACKGROUND: The ZF2001 vaccine, which contains a dimeric form of the receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant, was shown to be safe, with an acceptable side-effect profile, and immunogenic in adults in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to investigate the efficacy and confirm the safety of ZF2001. The trial was performed at 31 clinical centers across Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Ecuador; an additional center in China was included in the safety analysis only. Adult participants (≥18 years of age) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a total of three 25-µg doses (30 days apart) of ZF2001 or placebo. The primary end point was the occurrence of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), as confirmed on polymerase-chain-reaction assay, at least 7 days after receipt of the third dose. A key secondary efficacy end point was the occurrence of severe-to-critical Covid-19 (including Covid-19-related death) at least 7 days after receipt of the third dose. RESULTS: Between December 12, 2020, and December 15, 2021, a total of 28,873 participants received at least one dose of ZF2001 or placebo and were included in the safety analysis; 25,193 participants who had completed the three-dose regimen, for whom there were approximately 6 months of follow-up data, were included in the updated primary efficacy analysis that was conducted at the second data cutoff date of December 15, 2021. In the updated analysis, primary end-point cases were reported in 158 of 12,625 participants in the ZF2001 group and in 580 of 12,568 participants in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 75.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.0 to 79.8). Severe-to-critical Covid-19 occurred in 6 participants in the ZF2001 group and in 43 in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 87.6% (95% CI, 70.6 to 95.7); Covid-19-related death occurred in 2 and 12 participants, respectively, for a vaccine efficacy of 86.5% (95% CI, 38.9 to 98.5). The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was balanced in the two groups, and there were no vaccine-related deaths. Most adverse reactions (98.5%) were of grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of adults, the ZF2001 vaccine was shown to be safe and effective against symptomatic and severe-to-critical Covid-19 for at least 6 months after full vaccination. (Funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04646590.).

Protective prototype-Beta and Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.

Breakthrough infections by SARS-CoV-2 variants become the global challenge for pandemic control. Previously, we developed the protein subunit vaccine ZF2001 based on the dimeric receptor-binding domain (RBD) of prototype SARS-CoV-2. Here, we developed a chimeric RBD-dimer vaccine approach to adapt SARS-CoV-2 variants. A prototype-Beta chimeric RBD-dimer was first designed to adapt the resistant Beta variant. Compared with its homotypic forms, the chimeric vaccine elicited broader sera neutralization of variants and conferred better protection in mice. The protection of the chimeric vaccine was further verified in macaques. This approach was generalized to develop Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer to adapt the currently prevalent variants. Again, the chimeric vaccine elicited broader sera neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants and conferred better protection against challenge by either Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 in mice. The chimeric approach is applicable for rapid updating of immunogens, and our data supported the use of variant-adapted multivalent vaccine against circulating and emerging variants.

Heterologous prime-boost immunizations with chimpanzee adenoviral vectors elicit potent and protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A safe and effective vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is urgently needed to tackle the COVID-19 global pandemic. Here, we describe the development of chimpanzee adenovirus serotypes 6 and 68 (AdC6 and AdC68) vector-based vaccine candidates expressing the full-length transmembrane spike glycoprotein. We assessed the vaccine immunogenicity, protective efficacy, and immune cell profiles using single-cell RNA sequencing in mice. Mice were vaccinated via the intramuscular route with the two vaccine candidates using prime-only regimens or heterologous prime-boost regimens. Both chimpanzee adenovirus-based vaccines elicited strong and long-term antibody and T cell responses, balanced Th1/Th2 cell responses, robust germinal center responses, and provided effective protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in mouse lungs. Strikingly, we found that heterologous prime-boost immunization induced higher titers of protective antibodies, and more spike-specific memory CD8+ T cells in mice. Potent neutralizing antibodies produced against the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 lineage (also known as N501Y.V1) and B.1.351 lineage (also known as N501Y.V2) were detectable in mouse sera over 6 months after prime immunization. Our results demonstrate that the heterologous prime-boost strategy with chimpanzee adenovirus-based vaccines is promising for further development to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A tandem-repeat dimeric RBD protein-based covid-19 vaccine zf2001 protects mice and nonhuman primates.

Safe, efficacious, and deployable vaccines are urgently needed to control COVID-19 in the large-scale vaccination campaigns. We report here the preclinical studies of an approved protein subunit vaccine against COVID-19, ZF2001, which contains tandem-repeat dimeric receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein with alum-based adjuvant. We assessed vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy in both mice and non-human primates (NHPs). ZF2001 induced high levels of RBD-binding and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in both mice and non-human primates, and elicited balanced TH1/TH2 cellular responses in NHPs. Two doses of ZF2001 protected Ad-hACE2-transduced mice against SARS-CoV-2 infection, as detected by reduced viral RNA and relieved lung injuries. In NHPs, vaccination of either 25 µg or 50 µg ZF2001 prevented infection with SARS-CoV-2 in lung, trachea, and bronchi, with milder lung lesions. No evidence of disease enhancement was observed in both animal models. ZF2001 has been approved for emergency use in China, Uzbekistan, Indonesia, and Columbia. The high safety, immunogenicity, and protection efficacy in both mice and NHPs found in this preclinical study was consistent with the results in human clinical trials.

Humoral and cellular immunity and the safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a summary of data published by 21 May 2021.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths, and serious consequences to public health, economies and societies. Rapid responses in vaccine development have taken place since the isolation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the release of the viral genome sequence. By 21 May 2021, 101 vaccines were under clinical trials, and published data were available for 18 of them. Clinical study results from some vaccines indicated good immunogenicity and acceptable reactogenicity. Here, we focus on these 18 vaccines that had published clinical data to dissect the induced humoral and cellular immune responses as well as their safety profiles and protection efficacy.

Fast and long-lasting immune response to S-trimer COVID-19 vaccine adjuvanted by PIKA.

In the face of the emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2, there is an urgent need to develop a vaccine that can induce fast, effective, long-lasting and broad protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Here, we developed a trimeric SARS-CoV-2 S protein vaccine candidate adjuvanted by PIKA, which can induce robust cellular and humoral immune responses. The results showed a high level of neutralizing antibodies induced by the vaccine was maintained for at least 400 days. In the study of non-human primates, PIKA adjuvanted S-trimer induced high SARS-CoV-2 neutralization titers and protected from virus replication in the lung following SARS-CoV-2 challenge. In addition, the long-term neutralizing antibody response induced by S-trimer vaccine adjuvanted by PIKA could neutralize multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants and there is no obvious different among the SARS- CoV-2 variants of interest or concern, including B.1.351, B.1.1.7, P.1, B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2 variants. These data support the utility of S-trimer protein adjuvanted by PIKA as a potential vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43556-021-00054-z.